The federal government’s total housing goal for London is, allow us to recall, a heroic 81,000 new dwellings a yr for the subsequent 5 years, a determine described by Angela Rayner in her September letter to Sadiq Khan as “formidable however deliverable” and by others as little or no much less absurd than the 100,000 it was lowered from. As Rayner herself noticed to the Mayor, the London common between 2019 and 2023 was a mere 37,200. With the development sector as a complete barely re-pointing a chimney pot of late, who’s going to produce the additional 40-odd thousand every year?
Not, it could seem, the capital’s housing associations, suppliers of so a lot of London’s new “inexpensive” properties in current occasions, however as of late weighed down by a complete bunch of different calls for. On Tuesday, the Home of Commons housing, communities and native authorities committee heard from 4 sector bosses, together with Kate Henderson, chief govt of the Nationwide Housing Federation, and Fiona Fletcher-Smith, chief govt of L&Q and chair of the G15 group of London’s largest housing associations.
Fletcher-Smith was requested by committee chair Florence Eshalomi, MP for Vauxhall, what quantity of L&Q’s spending at present goes on constructing new inventory in contrast with sustaining what already exists. “It has shifted significantly over the previous 5 years,” Fletcher-Smith replied. Most outgoings are “on current properties” as of late, she defined, within the type of day-to-day repairs and deliberate upkeep, corresponding to changing home windows and doorways, bringing dwellings as much as the First rate Houses Normal and likewise “attempting to maneuver in direction of internet zero”.
One other issue is the excessive price of constructing issues. Like business builders, housing associations must borrow cash with a purpose to put money into new properties. Fletcher-Smith mentioned L&Q carries “about £5 billion of borrowing”, principally for brand new housing growth. That debt, she continued, has resulted from having to make up for much less cash being offered by nationwide authorities. Till 20 years in the past, 50 per cent of housing associations’ spending on new properties got here from the federal government. As we speak, in London, it accounts for less than 22 per cent.
Henderson, talking for housing associations throughout England, then went into extra element. She described the place of the sector as “fragile”, a phrase that appears apt given the near-halt of development within the capital final yr. She laid out some historical past, too: “In 2010, the federal government slashed the capital funds for inexpensive housing.” This “large change” has created the necessity to “borrow towards our future earnings streams from lease,” Henderson continued.
Hire formulation are set by the federal government. In 2015, a ten-year settlement was reached such that lease ranges would rise by the Shopper Value Index (CPI) inflation price plus one p.c a yr. However that was overturned in 2016, changed by a four-year interval of lease discount. Why? As everybody knew on the time, it was Conservative Chancellor George Osborne’s wheeze for decreasing the rocketing housing profit invoice, which was changing into a humiliation for him.
Extra lately, a lease freeze was imposed amid rocketing vitality worth inflation. Good for hard-pressed tenants whose rents aren’t lined by housing profit, after all. However for housing associations, it was yet one more contributor to earnings from rents being, in Henderson’s phrases, “15 per cent decrease in actual phrases than it could have been in 2015 – it’s taken an enormous quantity of capability out of the system”.
Throw in excessive rates of interest on borrowing, excessive inflation affecting just about every part, and the necessity for post-Grenfell security work, and what Henderson known as a “essential shift in direction of our current inventory” has made rising sense. Spending on repairs and upkeep has “hit a file excessive,” she mentioned, which could be proper and good of itself, but additionally means much less cash for constructing new stuff.
All housing affiliation spending, given the shrinkage in grant funding, relies upon closely on earnings from rents. No marvel the G15 has written an open letter to Rayner agreeing along with her proposed revival of CPI+1 lease will increase and asking for the association to final for ten years, offering long-term monetary certainty. The letter additionally urges the federal government to extend grant funding to construct new social properties and to permit social landlords fuller entry to particular security funds, which, as Henderson advised the committee, is usually serving to personal constructing homeowners.
Eshalomi, a former London Meeting member and an ex-chair of Lambeth’s housing scrutiny committee when she was a councillor, raised the difficulty of poor repairs and upkeep by housing associations, saying this was an issue for a lot of of her constituents and people of fellow MPs. It’s also one lined in some depth by On London of late. Dissatisfied tenants would possibly ask why housing associations ought to get more cash, on condition that, of their expertise, funds they at present haven’t being spent successfully.
Henderson cited shortages of excellent tradespeople and efforts being made within the sector to enhance its understanding of the state of its properties and the wants of those that stay in them. “However the greater situation right here,” she insisted, “is round having sufficient cash to correctly be sure that our properties are match for function. There are large pressures on organisations when it comes to the stretch and notably in conditions the place there are massive constructing security prices. There’s simply not sufficient cash within the system”.
The committee session echoed factors made at a London Society occasion final November by Heather Thomas, chief govt of Sapphire Unbiased Housing, one in every of London’s smaller housing associations. She, too, cited the profound, cumulative monetary impacts of grant cuts and lease reductions and caps, and the excessive price of borrowing and of constructing within the capital. “Individuals preserve saying, why aren’t you constructing? That’s why!”
Except and till housing associations in London get on a firmer and stronger monetary footing, Angela Rayner’s 81,000 properties a yr goal will carry on trying extra formidable than it’s deliverable.
Watch the committee session in full on Parliament TV.
OnLondon.co.uk gives distinctive protection of the capital’s politics, growth and tradition. Assist the web site and its writers for simply £5 a month or £50 a yr and get issues that different individuals received’t. Particulars HERE. Observe Dave Hill on Bluesky.
