The Labour-run council needs to alter borough planning insurance policies in ways in which displease the London Mayor
Metropolis Corridor Conservatives have been identified to upbraid Labour Mayors by declaring that fifty per cent of nothing is nothing. The barb has been geared toward planning insurance policies requiring half of all properties in new residential developments within the capital to be “reasonably priced” in some kind if permission for a scheme is to be granted.
The argument goes that supplying the 50 per cent would so erode builders’ income that the scheme can be rendered financially unviable. Outcome? The scheme is deserted, which means no new properties of any variety are constructed, “reasonably priced” ones included.
Some would possibly dismiss this as a conventional Tory aversion to regulation and an unfounded religion in good outcomes flowing from the free play of market forces. But an analogous case has been made on behalf of Sir Sadiq Khan in a crisp rejection of Labour-run Wandsworth Council’s proposals for altering its native planning guidelines.
The affair has illuminated each the mathematical calculations that inform Mayor Khan’s insurance policies on this space and conflicting philosophies about housing provide, together with inside Labour circles. It has additionally generated some instructive social media exchanges.
The disagreement started after Wandsworth, which got here beneath Labour management in Could 2022 for the primary time since 1978, submitted draft plans for a “partial overview” of its current borough Native Plan, which was adopted in July 2023.
Mooted modifications included give planning purposes for personal developer home constructing schemes an incentivising “quick monitor route” to approval if 45 per cent of the full variety of properties envisaged had been deemed “reasonably priced”. However Native Plans need to be in what’s termed “normal conformity” with the Mayor’s London Plan, the capital’s grasp planning blueprint. The Mayor’s plan has a fast-track threshold of solely 35 per cent for websites that aren’t on publicly-owned or industrial land.
(The Mayor additionally has an over-arching, long-term strategic goal of fifty per cent of properties on all new housing schemes assembly his definition of “genuinely reasonably priced”, however that features council and housing affiliation schemes and houses construct on publicly-owned land, akin to TfL’s).
Wandsworth additionally needs to introduce which can be referred to as “late-stage viability critiques” on fast-tracked initiatives, basically a approach of re-assessing a scheme’s monetary calculations to find if a bit extra housing affordability may be derived from it than was initially agreed. This too, says Metropolis Corridor, is “not in accordance” with the related London Plan coverage.
Amongst different points raised by Metropolis Corridor is a draft Wandsworth coverage concerning the mixture of reasonably priced varieties in new Construct to Lease lodging and proposed overview mechanisms for housing with shared services.
The letter additionally has a bit on a Wandsworth viability evaluation accompanying its draft Native Plan modifications. It says Metropolis Corridor officers have reviewed this and concluded that “the vast majority of the situations examined” in opposition to its provisions “look like unviable with 45 per cent reasonably priced housing”.
All instructed, Metropolis Corridor thinks what Wandsworth has in thoughts would lead to fewer reasonably priced properties being constructed reasonably than the upper quantity aspired to. In its phrases:
“Though meant to safe the next degree of reasonably priced housing, in apply this might disincentivise candidates from following the FTR [fast-track route], and require the vast majority of schemes on non-public land to be viability examined, slowing down the planning course of and requiring further resourcing to evaluate purposes. Most significantly, it is usually more likely to lead to decrease ranges of reasonably priced housing being secured and/or scale back the effectiveness of viability critiques.”
Put one other approach, 45 per cent of nothing is nothing.
The upshot is that the Mayor would make identified his “normal conformity” concern at future Native Plan consultations and inquiries, which might not bode effectively for Wandsworth.
The council’s concepts have excited energetic debate on-line. Wandsworth’s cupboard member for housing, Aydin Dikerdem, an unreconstructed Corbynite, has been enthusiastically advocating the proposed modifications, as you’ll anticipate.
However Sam Dumitriu, head of coverage at assume tank Britain Remade, stated that “forcing builders to promote half the properties they construct at a large low cost will kill in any other case viable housing initiatives”. Referring to Wandsworth’s general technique goal of fifty per cent reasonably priced, he remarked – conveniently for this text – that “50% of 0 is 0”.
And Chris Worrall, a member of the chief committee of the Labour Housing Group, equally argued that Wandsworth’s was “dangerous coverage that leads to fewer social housing developments”. In a tart apart, he inquired: “Why do marxists not perceive maths?” Dickerdem and Worrall engaged in frank change of views. Worrall has since written a extra detailed critique of Wandsworth’s Native Plan overview at Left Foot Ahead.
Who is correct? I’m leaning in the direction of the Mayor’s perspective on the grounds that not a rattling factor is getting constructed for the time being and his coverage chiefs, together with Angela Rayner’s division, are attempting each which strategy to get stalled schemes going as it’s, with out boroughs offering builders with additional causes for delay.
However, in the long run, it’s all the time, all the time about balances, priorities, resolving dilemmas and, to not be forgotten, doing no matter it takes to get essentially the most properties with essentially the most affordableness priced in constructed for as many Londoners as attainable. Talk about.
Replace, 16 March 2025: It has been identified that Wandsworth has, since 2016, had a “shared staffing construction” with next-door, Lib Dem-run Richmond, which in 2023 was instructed by Metropolis Corridor that its need to set a neighborhood fast-track threshold of fifty per cent was not generally conformity with the London Plan.
Maybe Wandsworth, although suggested by the identical officers and certainly accustomed to what had occurred with Richmond, determined to nonetheless have a go at getting Metropolis Corridor to simply accept the next threshold than its personal 35 per cent by going for 5 per cent decrease than Richmond had. If that’s the case, it didn’t work.
OnLondon.co.uk offers distinctive, no-advertising and no-paywall protection of the capital’s politics, improvement and tradition. Assist the web site and its writers for simply £5 a month or £50 a yr and get issues that different individuals received’t. Particulars HERE. Comply with Dave Hill on Bluesky. Picture of Wandsworth Council housing from council web site.
