It is a massive yr for London authorities anniversaries. The London boroughs are celebrating their sixtieth birthday this month and the Better London Authority (GLA) shall be 25 in Could or July, relying on whether or not you select the date of the inaugural elections for a Mayor of London and the London Meeting in Could 2000 or the formal “vesting” of powers that occurred in July of that yr.
By means of a birthday greeting, London Councils has proposed becoming a member of the Mayor’s get together by establishing one thing much like the mayoral “mixed authorities” that function elsewhere within the nation. In Better Manchester, West Yorkshire, the West Midlands and the seven different mayoral mixed authority areas, a directly-elected metro mayor presides over a council of native authority leaders and mayors and must safe its settlement for budgets, methods and plans.
In London, a council of 34 members – the Mayor and the capital’s 33 native authorities – could be unwieldy, so London Councils has proposed a “mixed board”, comprising the Mayor and its personal 12 “government members”, a party-proportional cross-section of council leaders holding particular Londonwide remits. This board may take choices on “related powers and funding”.
Such a change could be an enormous deal, maybe greater than London Councils is admitting. The GLA mannequin of a powerful government mayor and a scrutinising meeting was particularly designed to minimise overlap with borough remits. Though this precept has been eroded over time – for instance, by giving the Mayor extra powers on housing and land – establishing a London Mayoral Mixed Board suggests one thing somewhat totally different.
For a begin, it might name into query the position of deputy mayors. The unique Better London Authority Act (1999) gave Mayors restricted powers to nominate employees. Ken Livingstone used these powers to nominate senior advisors on economics, housing, transport, the atmosphere and different related coverage areas.
Underneath Boris Johnson these have been renamed “deputy mayors” (there may be additionally a “statutory deputy mayor”, a London Meeting member appointed to succeed a Mayor unable to proceed in workplace). If there was a deputy mayor for housing and a London Councils government member for housing, who would communicate for the Mayoral Mixed Board on the problem?
The same challenge arises with the London Meeting. London Councils argue that there could be no change to the Meeting’s position, however this doesn’t really feel proper. In addition to scrutinising the Mayor, the Meeting indicators off his finances and methods and has different powers which, although fairly modest, give it authority and affect which could be important, if judiciously used.
Had been the Meeting to proceed in its present kind underneath the London Councils proposals, there could be a state of affairs through which a (directly-elected) Mayor proposed a finances or technique to be first agreed by a Mayoral Mixed Board (representing 32 elected boroughs plus the Metropolis of London Company) after which handed to a (proportionately elected) London Meeting for affirmation.
This may appear to be an onerous train in triple-handling and a recipe for disputes over mandates and remits. But when the Meeting misplaced these powers it might lose a lot of its chunk. By which case, why not substitute it with a borough grouping just like the Overview and Scrutiny Committee in Better Manchester?
In such respects, the London Councils plan is extra radical than it’d seem like at first look. However most significantly of all, is it a great plan?
London Councils argue that London’s present preparations have develop into anomalous within the new devolution order. With mayoral or different strategic authorities set to be established throughout England, London’s “may develop into the one upper-tier council leaders within the nation with no formal say over the selections of their area’s Strategic Authority”.
It’s true that London’s preparations are totally different, however so is London. The Devolution White Paper revealed in December seems to acknowledge this. It pledges to use an built-in monetary settlement for London “whereas retaining pe-existing bespoke London preparations…[and] current methods of working with London Councils”.
Mockingly, Sir Sadiq Khan has gone quite a bit additional than his two antecedents in working carefully with the boroughs. The latest London Progress Plan was developed in partnership with them, constructing on the work of the jointly-chaired London Restoration Board and London Partnership Board throughout and after the pandemic.
Mayoral methods and budgets are all topic to session with the boroughs, however there are some areas the place the Mayor has, by design, an unbiased and overriding position. The primary instance is powers over planning coverage, the place borough native plans should replicate London Plan insurance policies (following session) and the Mayor retains a proper to take strategic choices over the heads of particular person boroughs. (The White Paper, by the best way, pledges that each one metro mayors will obtain comparable powers, which appears onerous to sq. with the “collegiate” mannequin of mixed authority authorities.)
It’s true that Better Manchester has ready a joint plan, Locations for Everybody, which was adopted final yr. However the doc took ten years to finalise, one borough (Stockport) withdrew from the method, and the plan has been criticised as merely drawing collectively unambitious native housing plans somewhat than searching for to take a strategic – and generally disputed – view of want and alternative.
However possibly there’s an even bigger image method that may be taken to reform in London. Maybe new preparations might be devised that will permit London’s boroughs to have higher formal involvement within the growth of the town’s financial methods and plans, but in addition allow the Mayor to have extra say in overseeing and co-ordinating council companies and regulatory capabilities – from licensing to social care to avenue cleansing.
It may additionally be a possibility to look once more on the construction of the boroughs themselves. One factor that the West Midlands and, to a lesser extent, Better Manchester have is a single native authority overseeing the entire of the core of the cities they serve. The LSE’S Better London Group recommended such an authority for London to the Herbert Fee within the early Sixties, however this was not adopted via when the 1965 reforms have been put into place.
The Better London Authority has already outlived the Better London Council by 5 years. Whereas few would want to repeat the chaotic and politically-motivated abolition of the GLC, the sixtieth and twenty fifth anniversaries could also be a time for reflection on how effectively present set-ups are serving London. However whether or not the London Councils proposals are a foundation for a brand new settlement, a contribution to a extra far-reaching debate or destined to be only a footnote in London authorities historical past stays to be seen.
Richard Brown labored on the Better London Authority in numerous capacities from its set-up in 1999 till 2006. Observe Richard on Bluesky.
OnLondon.co.uk gives distinctive, no-advertising and no-paywall protection of the capital’s politics, growth and tradition. Help the web site and its writers for £5 a month or £50 a yr and get issues that different individuals received’t. Particulars HERE.
