For some months, the Mayor of Higher Manchester, Andy Burnham, has confronted criticism and authorized stress for facilitating housing schemes in his space which can be all “luxurious” and no “inexpensive” – the type of factor his counterpart in London, Sir Sadiq Khan, has guidelines in opposition to.
Burnham’s administration has been loaning many thousands and thousands of kilos to a property developer to construct towers of deluxe, market-priced flats (pictured). In the meantime, making constructing inexpensive for builders than it is likely to be elsewhere is a coverage of Manchester Metropolis Council, which is a part of the broader mixed authority Burnham leads. As its Information to Improvement in Manchester states, the council is presently charging no Group Infrastructure Levy (CIL) as a situation of granting planning consents.
The CIL is one in all methods through which native authorities can make sure that the necessity for extra transport, well being, academic and environmental provision created by new improvement is met and paid for out of builders’ income. One other, longer-established, mechanism at councils’ disposal for attaining related targets are agreeing developer contributions below Part 106 of the City and Nation Planning Act (1990).
Confusingly, CIL and S106 funds can be utilized to fund lots of the similar issues, and Manchester reserves its proper to ask builders for the latter. They’re additionally totally different – considerably so in that CIL can’t be used to pay for inexpensive housing. And Manchester’s most recently-published assertion of the funding it has secured from S106 suggests it doesn’t drive a really exhausting discount – at the least, not by comparability with native authorities in London.
Within the monetary yr 2023/24, Manchester Metropolis Council acquired £5.7 million in S106 contributions (paragraph 5.1). The London Borough of Southwark, in the meantime, acquired £38 million from CIL and S106 mixed and secured commitments to an additional £5 million.
The Manchester native authority space is greater than Southwark: it covers 45 sq. miles and places its inhabitants at getting on for 600,000, whereas Southwark occupies simply 11 sq. miles and is house to solely 312,000. But the south London council brings in about seven instances as a lot in developer contributions.
On the opposite facet of the Thames, Camden – land space 8.4 sq. miles, inhabitants 210,000 – collected £10.2 million in CIL and acquired £23 million in S106, with an additional £11.8 million agreed. And Westminster Metropolis Council? £20.4 million in CIL collected, £61.4 million in S106.
How about farther from the centre? Haringey? £3.2 million acquired in CIL, £5 million acquired in S106. Newham? £4 million in CIL, £10.2 million in S106. Additional out nonetheless? Croydon: £5.1 in CIL receipts, £2.3 million acquired in S106. Redbridge: £6.2 million in CIL, £900,000 in S106.
There are sub-divisions of CIL and a few of it goes to the Mayor, however I you’re getting the image. London’s native authorities, even those who increase comparatively low quantities of CIL and S106 in contrast with different boroughs, rating larger by that measure than Manchester.
What’s occurring? A part of it’s merely that the property market in Higher London is extra beneficial than Manchester’s. Every thing includes much more cash: land is costlier, labour is costlier and so forth. However the return on investments could be greater too. Put very crudely, the better the potential income, the extra scope a borough might need for getting just a few million out of the deal for issues a neighbourhood affected by new developments wants that may not in any other case receives a commission for.
However a part of it’s also about priorities. On the subject of housing, the Mayor of London has powers to insist on a sure share of that offered by means of the planning system with out grant funding from him being “inexpensive” – and he has proven all through his time at Metropolis Corridor that he’s fairly ready to make use of these powers. And, in any case, boroughs, in particular person methods and to differing levels, wish to extract inexpensive housing from builders – together with transport and avenue enhancements, carbon offset funds, faculties and medical doctors’ surgical procedures – as a result of native residents need and wish these issues.
However Manchester Metropolis Council and Higher Manchester’s Mayor have lengthy been working in a distinct financial setting. Though Higher London’s productiveness development has been modest for the reason that world monetary disaster of 2007/08, it stays by a good distance the UK’s most economically productive place. Higher Manchester is miles behind.
A Decision Basis report from 2023 acknowledges that it has picked up over the previous 20 years, but in addition bluntly states that it has “barely saved tempo with productiveness development throughout the UK as an entire” and “stays 35 per cent much less productive than London”.
Higher Manchester’s politicians must nurture and appeal to extra highly-qualified folks and “excessive worth” corporations. One approach to go about that’s to make it extra enticing for builders to construct the sorts of workplaces and different workspaces that such folks would possibly wish to dwell in and such corporations would possibly wish to arrange store in.
Wanting decrease quantities of infrastructure funding from them than London authorities does – and even none in any respect – is one approach to attempt to tempt such funding. If CIL and S106 offers are thought to be a sort of native tax, then Mayor Burnham and Manchester Metropolis Council have been creating an area low tax setting in an effort to attract funding they wouldn’t in any other case get – maybe as a result of, all else being equal, it will moderately go to London, the core of the UK economic system, the place the returns are usually higher.
“The Manchester strategy is a type of tax competitors,” says Professor Tony Travers, director of LSE London. “By having little or no by the use of developer contributions, coupled with public sector loans and a liberal planning coverage, the coverage is designed to make Manchester extra enticing than different cities. London, in contrast, makes property improvement ship native advantages past the houses and workplaces constructed.”
Travers factors out that in London not solely social and different inexpensive housing have been constructed and paid for by non-public builders, however even “an Underground extension, theatres and different new amenities”. He notes the irony that “the very stress on London to ship such contributions most likely additional will increase the town’s productiveness”.
The Decision Basis report raised doubts about Higher Manchester’s strategy, enshrined in its Locations for Everybody plan. The suppose tank recognises that housebuilding in costly central areas is smart at first look, as “interior metropolis residing is usually well-liked and an indicator of ‘turnaround cities’.” Nevertheless, it goes on to argue that in Manchester’s case there’s “a really robust case for prioritising metropolis centre land for business, moderately than residential, constructing” and that it ought to maintain sway.
No matter one of the best stability for Higher Manchester, its perspective to builders could be very totally different from that present in Higher London. The latter has a little bit of leverage and its politicians attempt to use it, continuing on the idea that if they’re to present their blessing to a personal firm to make a whole bunch of thousands and thousands of kilos on its patch, that firm has wider obligations – and may put its hand in its pocket accordingly. Higher Manchester, in contrast, goes out of its approach to allow them to off.
OnLondon.co.uk offers distinctive, no-advertising and no-paywall protection of the capital’s politics, improvement and tradition. Help the web site and its writers for simply £5 a month or £50 a yr and get issues that different folks gained’t. Particulars HERE. Observe Dave Hill on Bluesky. Picture from Renaker web site.
