Labour confronted a tricky by-election contest in Thursday within the Westminster Metropolis Council ward of Vincent Sq.. It was essentially the most precarious London seat Labour has needed to defend in a by-election within the borough since profitable management of it for the primary time in its historical past in Could 2022, and its possibilities of holding it weren’t nice.
The Conservatives duly gained the seat and in so doing trimmed Labour’s majority to 4 – 29 seats to the Tories’ 25. However Labour strategists won’t be trying on the consequence with undue alarm. Allow us to study the ward itself and the outcome.
The ward is well-defined on the map, marked out by Vauxhall Bridge Highway, Victoria Road, Horseferry Highway and the River Thames. The landmarks best-known to the informal customer are the Tate Britain gallery overlooking the Thames and the striped brick, flip of the century Westminster Cathedral on the different finish of the ward.
Political historians could notice that it additionally comprises Millbank Tower, operations centre of New Labour again within the Nineteen Nineties. MI5’s headquarters at Thames Home is likely one of the ward’s main employers. Vincent Sq. itself is one among central London’s largest, with the taking part in fields of Westminster Faculty within the backyard within the center. A lot of the ward is handy for the Palace of Westminster and the federal government and political establishments in its hinterland.
However it might be a mistake to affiliate it fully with grandeur and privilege. It’s the location of a couple of milestone within the historical past of public housing, and this has had a powerful affect on its political historical past. A lot of the ward was a marshy, uncared for nook of interior Westminster earlier than being extensively rebuilt within the late nineteenth and early twentieth Centuries. There was a big jail at Millbank, nevertheless it was closed in 1890.
A part of the jail web site was used for the Tate Gallery, because it was initially referred to as, and half for the London County Council ‘s Millbank Property, a harmonious city atmosphere of tall, red-brick mansion blocks and tree-lined streets. The blocks are, in a nod to the Tate, named after artists. It stays a well-liked place to stay.
Simply not far away is the Grosvenor Property, whose Web page Road blocks of flats (1928-30) with their distinctive chequerboard design have been Sir Edwin Lutyens’s solely public housing fee. This property was focused within the Nineteen Eighties by Dame Shirley Porter’s gerrymandering coverage, by which then Conservative managed Westminster Council offered off housing at a reduction on the open market slightly than letting it to new tenants in an try to change the world’s political complexion.
The housing had been leased to the council in 1937 by the 2nd Duke of Westminster and his household trustees with a stipulation that it needs to be “dwellings for the working lessons”. However Westminster needed to make them out there on the market after they grew to become vacant. In 1990, when the matter got here to in courtroom, the council argued that “working class” was a meaningless time period, however the courts agreed with the sixth Duke that it was nonetheless very a lot related.
Of parenthetical curiosity, your correspondent lived in one among these blocks within the mid-Nineteen Nineties, renting from a Proper-to-Purchase purchaser, though my job wasn’t stereotypically proletarian. The flat was usually well-designed, although it suffered from condensation. The group there was nice. The Regency Café, a effective working males’s café, was an everyday hang-out and nonetheless is, for taxi drivers and civil servants alike.
The nook of the ward round Westminster Cathedral, near Victoria station, is the exception to most generalisations about Vincent Sq.. The streets there are lined with costly privately-built mansion blocks. The generalisation that holds is that the folks of the ward stay in flats – 97 per cent of households, the eighth highest proportion in England (I’m indebted to Andrew Teale for highlighting this truth).
The primary demographic teams within the ward are “youthful professionals in smaller flats”, multi-ethnic property communities and metropolitan professionals – 46 per cent are skilled or managerial and 73 per cent are of working age. The inhabitants is majority white (60 per cent) together with a number of communities of mainland European origin (significantly Italians), 17 per cent Asian, eight per cent black and 16 per cent different and blended. It’s a cosmopolitan space.
Politically, Vincent Sq. and its pre-2002 predecessor, Millbank, have fascinating histories. Millbank ward was a marginal. It was Conservative in 1982 however Labour from 1986 till 1998 when, slightly in opposition to the pattern, the Conservatives gained two of its three seats from Labour.
The inaugural outcome for Vincent Sq. ward, in 2002, was an enormous Conservative win, by 68 per cent to twenty per cent, and it appeared to have turn out to be a protected Tory seat. The addition of the Westminster Cathedral space was a particular enhancement to Tory prospects. But as time went on, the Conservative majority eroded and by 2018 the ward was trying marginal once more, despite the fact that the Tories held all three seats that 12 months.
Proprietor-occupation drove up the Conservative vote – proximity to Westminster and Victoria meant that the open market worth of the flats was excessive. However then the pattern switched and between 2011 and 2021 personal renting jumped from 29 per cent to 38 per cent, a lot of it in flats that had been purchased from the council and let loose at excessive rents to younger professionals wanting the central London location. As in Wandsworth, the brand new renters felt chillier in direction of the Tories than the individuals who had purchased their flats at a reduction, even earlier than the arrival of Brexit and tradition wars.
Even with this tailwind, although, Vincent Sq. ward didn’t yield absolutely to Labour in 2022. There was a cut up outcome, with two Conservative winners and one Labour. In share phrases, the Tory lead was a slim 46-43. The only real victorious Labour candidate, Gillian Arrindell, ran forward of her operating mates to safe a 27-vote majority over the lowest-polling Tory.
Thursday by-election was attributable to the loss of life of Arrindell in November from a stroke. She was an brisk campaigner, taking over roles for Westminster in championing air high quality and the pursuits of disabled folks. She was additionally an advocate for Palestine, homeless folks and victims of home violence.
Her successor as Labour candidate, Joanna Camadoo-Rothwell, adopted in her footsteps in being head of coverage for a home violence charity. She had been additionally a councillor in Ealing from 2014 to 2022. She ran an brisk doorstep marketing campaign in a ward the place Labour might name on help from staffers from get together headquarters and Parliament in addition to native members. The get together was defending its report of operating Westminster, helped by the commonly optimistic view that residents take of the administration and the excessive commonplace of its housing companies.
All 5 fundamental events stood candidates, as did the Christian Individuals’s Alliance (CPA). However the Conservatives, at all times the principle opposition, are better-organised – or no less than richer – in south Westminster than kind of anyplace else within the nation. Their candidate Michael Hayes (pictured, centre), a publican in Pimlico who stood unsuccessfully in 2022, received with 978 votes (45.4 per cent).
Camadoo-Rothwell was runner-up with 700 votes (32.5 per cent). Reform’s Nick Lockett was third (206 votes, 9.6 per cent) with the Liberal Democrat (156 votes) and the Inexperienced (101 votes) behind and the CPA mentioning the rear (14 votes). Turnout was a reasonably respectable 29.1 per cent.
The swing to Conservative since 2022 was a modest 5.6 per cent, decrease than in West Finish ward in September – the final Westminster contest between the 2 greatest events – when it was 9.5 per cent, or the earlier 2025 common of 9.4 per cent. And the drop in Labour’s vote share was 10.6 per cent, making it simply the least-bad Labour by-election outcome to date in 2025.
Placing the end in perspective, it’s about the place the events have been for the 2018 full council elections, which have been usually not unhealthy for Labour. Whereas the Conservatives would definitely retake Westminster if that form of swing have been to occur throughout the board in Could 2026, the outcome does level to a sure resilience in Labour’s vote in central areas, one thing which additionally reveals up in polling corporations’ MRP fashions.
The chances are in opposition to Westminster Labour with the ability to replicate their Could 2022 Marble Arch Mound-assisted miracle, but when the federal government’s reputation picks up and native councillors are capable of translate incumbency into private votes, the Vincent Sq. outcome reveals that it isn’t unthinkable. There may be nonetheless life within the staff’ motion in central London, even when the work the employees are doing isn’t the identical because it was within the Thirties.
Assist OnLondon.co.uk and its freelancers for simply £5 a month or £50 a 12 months and get issues on your cash that different folks don’t. Particulars HERE. Comply with Lewis Baston on Bluesky. Picture from Westminster Conservative group video.
